[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lugbe] spam

To: lugbe at lugbe.ch
Subject: Re: [lugbe] spam
From: Benjamin Stocker <bstocker at pingnet.ch>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 07:27:01 +0100
In-Reply-To: <000a01c16b02$fd6229a0$01000001 at niki>; from nhug at netconsulting.ch on Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 11:48:32PM +0100
Mail-Followup-To: Benjamin Stocker <bstocker at pingnet.ch>, lugbe at lugbe.ch
Organization: Media-Plus
References: <3BEE6AD6.4040600 at wernig.net> <20011111230524.A29799 at chiba.dyndns.org> <000a01c16b02$fd6229a0$01000001 at niki>
Sender: owner-lugbe at kalinka.catatec.ch
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 11:48:32PM +0100, Niklaus Hug wrote:
> > vergiss den sendmail. der sendmail ist müll. der kann alles und man muss
> > alles einstellen.
> >
> > bei andern mailern ist das standardmässig kein problem.  sendmail is
> 
> Meine Rede!

arghh... Bin ich denn hier der einzige sendmail advokat? :-)

Markus, kannst Du mir mal Dein sendmail.cf - oder noch besser -
sendmail.mc/m4 forwarden. Ich vermute, dass ein einziger switch
falsch ist. sendmail hat exzellente anti-spam features!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lugbe] spam
  - From: Wernig Markus <markus at wernig.net>

References:
- [lugbe] spam
  - From: Wernig Markus <markus at wernig.net>
- Re: [lugbe] spam
  - From: Mathias Gygax <mg at trash.net>
- Re: [lugbe] spam
  - From: "Niklaus Hug" <nhug at netconsulting.ch>

Prev by Date: Re: [lugbe] spam
Next by Date: Re: [lugbe] spam
Prev by thread: Re: [lugbe] spam
Next by thread: Re: [lugbe] spam
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread